Mogućnosti traženja (Strana 81 od 125)

Ja više ne kužim kako interpretirati AF ili AFQ.

Aggression Factor:

(# of bets + # of raises) / (# of calls)

Aggression Frequency:

(# of bets + # of raises) / (# of bets + # of raises + # of calls + # of folds)

Sa P2P of AF-u (sry puki, nadam se da se ne ljutiš šta spamam temu )

AF – Agression Factor is the 3rd of the typical PT stat trinity. Almost everyone uses AF (along w/ VPIP and PFR) to describe players, yet AF is probably the most misunderstood and misapplied commonly used Poker Tracker stat. So what is AF? As I mentioned above, AF = (bet% + raise%)/call%, but what does this really give us? Well the resulting number gives us a way to analyze how aggressive a certain player is. By looking at the formula, it is plain to see that betting ang raising increases our AF, while calling lowers it. Seems pretty simple right? Wrong! AF, can not be viewed in a vacuum as it relies heavily on other factors such as VPIP, Fold Flop% and WTSD% and is very relative to a player’s “style”. Let’s look at some examples:

We have 2 players at our table which have the following stats over the same amount of hands (let’s basically ignore convergance issues, and assume the sample in converged):

Player A : 13/10.5/2.5 (VPIP/PFR/AF)
Player B : 75/9/1

Now if we just looked at AF alone, one would think that Player A is more aggressive since his/her AF is 3. But is that really the case? Player A has a VPIP of 15 which basically is a range of 77+,A8s+,K9s+,QTs+,JTs,ATo+,KJo+. Note that I do understand that there is a difference between what a 13 VPIP player is playing and just the raw top 13% of hands. I do not want to adjust the range due to player tendancies, but thankfully it is not needed for this execise. Player A has a very small range compared to Player B, who at a VPIP of 75%, sits with a range of 22+,A2s+,K2s+,Q2s+,J2s+,T2s+,92s+,83s+,73s+,63s+,5 2s+,43s,A2o+,K2o+,Q2o+,J4o+,T6o+,96o+,86o+,75o+,65 o. Player A also has an AF 2.5 times that of Player B. Is he really 2.5 times as aggressive? Well the answer is MAYBE, BUT PROBABLY NOT! I can already hear your thoughts, “Wait… maybe?”. If Player B was as fit/fold as he is loose, then he will be folding a ton of his range on the flop. If he folds his additional 60% of played hands, plus he folds just as often as Player B does with his top 15%, then yes, Player B would be 3 times as aggressive. The reason I say probably not is because you will hardly ever find a player that plays so loose PF (75 VPIP), yet folds so very much on the flop.

Player A is almost always going to be the aggressor heading into the flop because he plays so few hands, but most of the hands he does play, he is playing strong PF with a raise. It’s pretty easy see that having such a small range of hands (all very strong/premium) will result in someone betting or raising 2.5 times as much as they call. Having such a strong range, this player will also not have to rely on a good flop to continue betting and raising. Compare that thought process to Player B now. Player B must be very aggressive if he is betting and raising at the same clip as he is calling. He is going to be betting and raising very often (equally often as calling if AF = 1) which will be extremely difficult with such a wide range of hands unless of course he is folding a ton of the flop as I mentioned earlier. The above example shows how AF is relative to playing styles in relation to VPIP and Fold Flop %. WTSD% is another stat which can have a pretty significant impact on a player’s AF. Obviously, the more a player makes it to SD, the more opportunities the player will have to bet/raise/call/fold. Players with high WTSD numbers have to work harder (be more aggressive?) to keep their AF from dropping. These types of players will be very good at value betting, or very bluffy, or just stubborn (bet/raise several barrels throughout entire hands).

A typical TAG player will have an AF between 1.5 and 2.5. 6max players should be very careful not to spew by being over aggressive just because it is shorthanded, while FR players must contend with seeing flops with potentially more people. FR players will be playing less hands and raising less PF than if they were playing 6max, thus actually making it easier to keep their AF up. Since we typically do not consider preflop when discussing AF, FR and 6max AFs will be fairly similar.

AF convergence is another interesting topic. One could assume that because there a many decision possibilities in each individual hand, that AF would converge faster than VPIP or PFR. The problem here is that the “type” of hand can have a huge impact on AF of smaller sample sizes of hands. Imagine a player flops a set and gets to raise/cap the flop, bet/3bet the turn and bet the river. This player has had 5 actions and bet them all. If this player is tight and aggressive, it will take a while for his AF to normalize. The more aggressive the player, the longer it will take for his AF to become something truly comprehendable, while a very passive player will typically show a quicker stabilization.

Are there other ways to measure a player’s aggression? I’m sure there are, but I’m not gonna address any approaches here, though it would be a great topic to cover, even if only in a thread for exploratory ideas. I would contend that any method should take folds and WTSD% into consideration.

So in conclusion, not all similar AFs are ACTUALLY similar and not all sub-1.25 AFs = passive.

   
Aggression Factor

Agression Factor, or AF, is a ratio (not a percentage) which describes the nature of a player's bets.

The formula for any given street is ( (bets + raises) / calls ) .

Bets, raises, and calls are all "money bets." Bets and raises, however, are aggressive (increasing the cost of playing) and calls are passive. Checks and folds are not in the equation because they are not bets.

An AF of 1.0 implies that the person makes bets about as often as they call bets.

Generally speaking, an AF dropping below .75 is to getting passive; many poor players online have AF's of .7 or lower. An AF over 1.5 or so is generally getting aggressive.
What does it mean to me?

Someone with a very low AF who bets or raises is very likely to have the strength they represent. You must respect their bet when deciding how to play your hand.

Someone with a very high AF is liable to be bluffing or semi-bluffing much of the time. You might call or raise back more liberally.
More to it than that

There's an important subtlelty to understand regarding AF vis-a-vis someone's looseness. A rock who only sees the flop 15% of the time and folds the flop 50% of the time may produce an AF of 3.0 by merely betting legitimate hands. Because they are so tight, they nearly always have a pair or high cards when they come in. Consequently, the 3.0 AF doesn't actually suggest excessive agression. The mere fact that they're on one of the few hands they didn't fold tells you they are holding strong cards; StraighforwardPlay will lead to a lot of bets and raises.

On the other hand, someone who sees the flop 75% of the time who has a 1.5 AF is ridiculously aggressive. Someone seeing almost every flop can't possibly be catching their cards that often, so a high AF tells you they must be bluffing and semi-bluffing, probably too often.

Someone's AF for a given street does not tell you how likely they are to bet. However, if they do put money up, it describes the kind of money. Bets made by a passive player are very likely to be legitimate. Bets made by a very aggressive player may also be bluffs, semi-bluffs, or marginal value bets.

Consider someone who bets 25% of the time, raises 15 % of the time, and calls 10% (the rest of the time they check or fold.) Their AF is 4.0. ((25+15)/10)

Compare to someone who bets 35% of the time, raises 20% of the time, and calls 30% of the time. Their AF is 1.833. ((35+20)/30)

The second person is a lot more likely to bet or raise -- they do it 55% of the time, far more than the first player's 40% of the time -- yet their AF is lower, because they call so much more loosely -- three time as often!

Generally speaking, you should adjust your perception of their AF based on how often they fold up to that point. If they fold a lot, that high AF doesn't mean they are they are all that aggressive, and if they rarely fold, a low AF may not mean every bet is legitimate.

Jok, pa nebi više pričali sa tobom da si nas zavlačio godinu dana sa pričom o SNE

Ne sjećam se sada da li je prvi puta 3betao ovaj session. Znam da je thinking player i da voli 3betat, pogotovo Ax kada ima poziciju. Zato sam i mislio da je call ok. Ako 4betam če mi foldat takve handove, sa jačim me može trappat ili shovat.

Koji range bi callali u toj poziciji?

Kasniš, ja sam prvi!

Biser

1k handova 26/20 3bet 10

____________________                  

Holdem Manager, No-Limit Hold'em Ring
Small Blind: $0.10
Big Blind: $0.25

BTN ($24.84)
SB ($49.37)
BB ($4.7)
UTG (hero) ($30.5)

Dealt to UTG (hero)

Preflop: (Pot is: $0.35)

UTG (hero) raises to $0.85, BTN raises to $2.9, SB & BB fold, UTG (hero) calls $2.05

Flop: (Pot is $6.15, 2 players)

UTG (hero) checks, BTN bets $4.1

Turn: (Pot is $10.25, 2 players)

River: (Pot is $10.25, 2 players)

                                                                     
Total Pot: $10.25 | Rake: $10.25

Roba če mislit došli obožavatelji, a krac, ono ekipa prodaje tomato bonove.

Desni klik na desktop, Properties, kartica Settings. Tamo podešavaš. Ali probaj samo spojit monitor an laptop i resetirati komp, trebao bi sam složiti. Ako ne uspiješ javi se na skype (dfable) pa ti pomognem.