Tema: INDUCER ALGORITAM

MOLIO BI SAMO ADMINA DA MI NE BLOKIRA RACUN JER NEMAM NIKAKVE NAMJERE PROMOVIRATI rigged poker.

naime kupio sam ebook preko lulu stranice koja kosta nekih 20dolara.Da ne pisem svasta jermi se neda upisite u google(inducer algoritam online poker i otvorite prvi link),tamo pise dio o tome,ja imam sve stranice te knjige

Moje iskustvo je  ALI KAO DA IMA NESTO U TOME

Riskirao sam 100dolara,igrao po toj knjizi,foldao SB,radio si tocan NET WINNING PERCENTENGE,nevjerovatno ali moj ROI JE bio kroz 25-30 turnira 400%,neznam jeli to samo good run ili ovo sranje

ZNACI NISAM IGRAO RUKE KOJE INACE IGRAM IZNAD 12.6666 POSTO NWP 8-HANDED STOL NA BWINU,ZBILJA NEVJEROVATNO

Sto vi mislite o ovome?Jos neka prevara???


There are several basics that I’ve observed:
- Net Winning Percentage
- Showdown Winning Percentage
- Number of Hands Played
- Number of Seats


Net Winning Percentage (NWP) is the “number of hands won *without* showdown” divided by the “number of hands played”.
This number is factored into determine who is dominating the table or potentially bullying (i.e. forcing too many people to fold all to often) since you never go to showdown.

If this number is too high, it defeats the fairness aspect that keeps PStars players (even the worst of them) coming back, which means less of a rake if those players disappear.

So, claims have been made that they include an equitable distribution algorithm to combat this.

Equitable distribution functions as a mode of fairness to prevent any single person from dominating the table. So at a 9 person table, they’ve figured that the net winning percentage for everyone should be very close to 11.111111% or (100/9) over the long term. If this were a 6 man table, the NWP for everyone should be 100/6 or 16.6666667%. At a HU table, it should be 50/50. This is also why proponents for online poker have long touted only focusing on maximizing profit on profit-making plays. Why? Well, if everyone had an unlimited supply of chips and everyone limped in every single game for 1 million games, it would all boil down to 11.111111% winnings for everyone at a 9 man table and everyone would eventually end up with the same number of chips as what they started with. This is equitable distribution – but it only works this way if and only if you have an unlimited supply of chips and every single person pushed all in for every single game for 1 million games. In reality, this never happens, which explains why some people are actually making profit… mostly from high buyins and large blinds. At a HU game, the logical NWP should be 50% over the long term, but eventually, the man who wins the most money will usually have the lowest NWP.


ADMIN EDIT: izbrisana psovka

Zadnji popravljao dajrakije (15-04-2018 00:50:21)

00

2

Re: INDUCER ALGORITAM

Sample ti je 25-30 turnira, to ti je run-good mode, odigraj jih još 5,000. tad budeš dobio realnu sliku   wink

Najbolje online poker rakeback ponude & pristup privatnim online igrama!
Javi se na e-mail:
manager@pokerpro.cc
10

Re: INDUCER ALGORITAM

Ici cu ovim putem sve dok me ide,ako pocnem gubit prekidam.Ipak mi je malo glupo foldat AK  jer mi jeNWP veci od dozovoljenog ali dosad se ova teorija cini istinita.

00

Re: INDUCER ALGORITAM

Onda si osiguravas prekidanje igranja, Kolko god da igras ispravno i dobro, ako igras turnire, gubit ces i to podosta al kud bi turnirski igrac dosao kad bi stao igrat nakon par izgubljenih turnira. Vjerovao il ne al netko tko je i super u turnirima, zacudio bi se koliko turnira gubi. It's just how math works

Good luck though ! wink

Zadnji popravljao Stormpay (16-04-2018 10:27:56)

10

Re: INDUCER ALGORITAM

Dobar turnirski igrac ima In the money % recimo od 13-16%, znaci ulazis u nagrade 1/6 turnira. Turnirski poker je seriozan grind grind grind, trebas odigrat ogromno turnira. Obozavam predanost turnirskih igraca, ako igras cash mozes prestati session u bilo kojem trenutku a turnirski trebaju igrat mnogo sati u isto vrijeme.
Gl  wink

00

Re: INDUCER ALGORITAM

Ma ipak mislim da je to cista budalastina,taj koji je objavio tu knjigu je vjerovatno prevarant a ja sam budala koja je nasjela,jos kad vidim chipleadera kako osvaja svaki pot....mislim....To je sve stvar HEATERA i COOLERA.Ajmo malo sad o tome

Dali bi se dalo izmanipulirat online poker?Dali netko osjeca kad je na HEATERU ili COOLERU?  JA DA

1.Igram na bwinu i mam osjecaj da nakon nekoliko tisuca ruku,mozda 10-ak se ponavljaju iste ruke i isti flopovi
2.kad sam na HEATERU jednostavno se bude usporenije(bwin poker) a na pokerstarsu karte jednostavno pocinju kao sporije se prikazivat.Jel ima netko jos takav osjecaj.Pratio sam to sve tocno i skoro pa mozda 80 posto ruku bi osvojio na showdanu na 1000ruku otprilike a poslije toga jednostavno NEMA SMISLA IGRAT jer se poce gubit abnormalno,nemoguce osvojit all in situaciju iako imam bolju ruku,e sad ako je to tako a 99% sam siguran da jeonda je najbolji nacin ljudi moji za zgrnut lovu

Heater-veliki turniri  Coler(dok ne prode) najmanji sto postoje
Pogledajte samo na Twich tv-u Jamie staplesa i video(mislim da se heater zove ili tako nesto) i vidite kako usporeno karet padaju  ili jos bolje Matt Staples(frajer je sosvojio 3.mjesto 215sunday HYPER,Moram naglasit supersonic a krenuo je sa 8 dolara i nakon toga boom,ocito da su znali on i njegov brat da su na HEATERU i ovaj mu sigurno dao za tak velik buy in i eto love

00