INDUCER ALGORITAM

MOLIO BI SAMO ADMINA DA MI NE BLOKIRA RACUN JER NEMAM NIKAKVE NAMJERE PROMOVIRATI rigged poker.

naime kupio sam ebook preko lulu stranice koja kosta nekih 20dolara.Da ne pisem svasta jermi se neda upisite u google(inducer algoritam online poker i otvorite prvi link),tamo pise dio o tome,ja imam sve stranice te knjige

Moje iskustvo je  ALI KAO DA IMA NESTO U TOME

Riskirao sam 100dolara,igrao po toj knjizi,foldao SB,radio si tocan NET WINNING PERCENTENGE,nevjerovatno ali moj ROI JE bio kroz 25-30 turnira 400%,neznam jeli to samo good run ili ovo sranje

ZNACI NISAM IGRAO RUKE KOJE INACE IGRAM IZNAD 12.6666 POSTO NWP 8-HANDED STOL NA BWINU,ZBILJA NEVJEROVATNO

Sto vi mislite o ovome?Jos neka prevara???

There are several basics that I’ve observed:
- Net Winning Percentage
- Showdown Winning Percentage
- Number of Hands Played
- Number of Seats

Net Winning Percentage (NWP) is the “number of hands won *without* showdown” divided by the “number of hands played”.
This number is factored into determine who is dominating the table or potentially bullying (i.e. forcing too many people to fold all to often) since you never go to showdown.

If this number is too high, it defeats the fairness aspect that keeps PStars players (even the worst of them) coming back, which means less of a rake if those players disappear.

So, claims have been made that they include an equitable distribution algorithm to combat this.

Equitable distribution functions as a mode of fairness to prevent any single person from dominating the table. So at a 9 person table, they’ve figured that the net winning percentage for everyone should be very close to 11.111111% or (100/9) over the long term. If this were a 6 man table, the NWP for everyone should be 100/6 or 16.6666667%. At a HU table, it should be 50/50. This is also why proponents for online poker have long touted only focusing on maximizing profit on profit-making plays. Why? Well, if everyone had an unlimited supply of chips and everyone limped in every single game for 1 million games, it would all boil down to 11.111111% winnings for everyone at a 9 man table and everyone would eventually end up with the same number of chips as what they started with. This is equitable distribution – but it only works this way if and only if you have an unlimited supply of chips and every single person pushed all in for every single game for 1 million games. In reality, this never happens, which explains why some people are actually making profit… mostly from high buyins and large blinds. At a HU game, the logical NWP should be 50% over the long term, but eventually, the man who wins the most money will usually have the lowest NWP.

ADMIN EDIT: izbrisana psovka

Zadnji popravljao dajrakije (15-04-2018 00:50:21)