Mogućnosti traženja (Strana 28 od 39)

Ok evo bumo pocekali ako se skupi jos ekipe pa cemo se cut na skype tko je kad slobodan i te fore... tilt i dfable dodao sam vas 

uvijek su mu fore kako ljudi mogu zvati sa tim kartama 

Bez hellmutha bi bilo dosadno 

Ne znam kako igrate na ovom al bez waiting lista, autorebuya i ostalih fancy gluposti nemoguce je igrat.. a da ne kazem koliko samo laga ima na sajtu.... vec sam isao na withdraw my funds 

al di sad igrat?

ajme koji software    cini se da necu dugo izdržat ovdje

I mislio sam da su 50BB max ali to nema veze... svejedno  se gura jer je stack to pot ratio mali... btw 50 BB igra i nije nesto jer nemas bas neke postflop igre i nedolazi tvoj skill toliko do izražaja... zato i ima riba tu... sigurno svako toliko gledas all-inove
Set mining sa QQ i 50BB  - nebih rekel?

igrao sam na nordici (merge isto ka i carbon) i stvarno je lako puknut all in ako multitableas... no kasnije sam nasao hide all in button zahvaljujući  robinom videu  sa turnira na nordici    ... probaj potraziti u opcijama, sacuvat ce ti zivaca i novaca 

Evo chatao support kaze da ce ga ponistiti    Nadam se da sa vase strane sada nece biti problema 

edit: cura na supportu je morala quitat 10$ po 10$ 

HITNO!    Ovak regal sam se prek pokerproa i taman sam htio depositat pa me pita dali cu uzeti poker 600$ first deposit bonus... ako ga uzmem dali imam 40% cahbacka ili nemam??

Neznam da bi ovaj bas callao samo flop sa QQ zbog fd-a.. kao i zbog mogucnosti da padnu A i K na turnu jeftino posto BB moze imati i AK... ovakav ogroman shove/rejz (5x) na turnu je Imo monster, nevjerujem da bi netko tako jako bluffao/semi bluffao ovaj board ako nisi luđak sa 3betanjem i imas solidan image... ulozio si skoro pola stacka pa je pušiona i stvarno teska olduka... ako imas ok 3bet statse, a on ne calla kao luđak 3betove naginjem foldu jer po ovom lineu ima TT ili JJ... vjerojatno tebe i stavlja na veliki overpar posto iz BB-a 3betas TAG UTG-a sto je gotovo uvijek za value i rijetko se blefa u ovoj situaciji iz njegove perspektive... posto on sigurno ne ide out of line da ti folda AA ili KK sa smecem mislim da je fold ok... thats my opinion... malo zbrkano al nadam se da se kuzi 

bs me zanima sto je okrenuo ak si callao... da nije AA 

64s ajd moze i rejzat ali je malo fancy i nepotrebno- foldat full na riveru?  ne bas.. ak ima 5h8h, 77 ili 99 jbga cooler... 78s je bacanje love ak se OOP ovako calla pogotovo ako izgleda da ce biti HU hand. velikom vecinom se nis ne flopa a na cbet mora foldat.. ili igrat guess game OOP. KQ hand - tribet je ok ako mislis da calla sa KT ili QJ i takvim sranjima koje dominiras.. ako pak folda na 3bet dosta onda je call  ok jer je hand odlican i igra odlicno postflop... A8o neznam...ja bi completao ili vrlo vjerojatno foldao makar izgleda prreweak... eh ovako je lako analizirat ali jedno je teorija drugo praksa 

Lol ajd da se ne svadjate 

Aggression Factor

Agression Factor, or AF, is a ratio (not a percentage) which describes the nature of a player's bets.

The formula for any given street is ( (bets + raises) / calls ) .

Bets, raises, and calls are all "money bets." Bets and raises, however, are aggressive (increasing the cost of playing) and calls are passive. Checks and folds are not in the equation because they are not bets.

An AF of 1.0 implies that the person makes bets about as often as they call bets.

Generally speaking, an AF dropping below .75 is to getting passive; many poor players online have AF's of .7 or lower. An AF over 1.5 or so is generally getting aggressive.

What does it mean to me?

Someone with a very low AF who bets or raises is very likely to have the strength they represent. You must respect their bet when deciding how to play your hand.

Someone with a very high AF is liable to be bluffing or semi-bluffing much of the time. You might call or raise back more liberally.

More to it than that

There's an important subtlelty to understand regarding AF vis-a-vis someone's looseness. A rock who only sees the flop 15% of the time and folds the flop 50% of the time may produce an AF of 3.0 by merely betting legitimate hands. Because they are so tight, they nearly always have a pair or high cards when they come in. Consequently, the 3.0 AF doesn't actually suggest excessive agression. The mere fact that they're on one of the few hands they didn't fold tells you they are holding strong cards; StraighforwardPlay will lead to a lot of bets and raises.

On the other hand, someone who sees the flop 75% of the time who has a 1.5 AF is ridiculously aggressive. Someone seeing almost every flop can't possibly be catching their cards that often, so a high AF tells you they must be bluffing and semi-bluffing, probably too often.

Someone's AF for a given street does not tell you how likely they are to bet. However, if they do put money up, it describes the kind of money. Bets made by a passive player are very likely to be legitimate. Bets made by a very aggressive player may also be bluffs, semi-bluffs, or marginal value bets.

Consider someone who bets 25% of the time, raises 15 % of the time, and calls 10% (the rest of the time they check or fold.) Their AF is 4.0. ((25+15)/10)

Compare to someone who bets 35% of the time, raises 20% of the time, and calls 30% of the time. Their AF is 1.833. ((35+20)/30)

The second person is a lot more likely to bet or raise -- they do it 55% of the time, far more than the first player's 40% of the time -- yet their AF is lower, because they call so much more loosely -- three time as often!

Generally speaking, you should adjust your perception of their AF based on how often they fold up to that point. If they fold a lot, that high AF doesn't mean they are they are all that aggressive, and if they rarely fold, a low AF may not mean every bet is legitimate.

What about YOUR AF?

Most good players suggest that a good limit player's AF will tend to be above 2.0; some advise 3.0. The best advice is that once your aggression is over 1.5, do not try to to raise it merely for the sake of raising it. If you do, you may end up exercising DumbAggression. You either need to add aggression at the right times, or to reduce your bad calls. You need to know which is which, and to adjust your play accordingly. If your problem is calling to much, adding wanton agression will not solve your calling problem! If you study when to avoid bad calls, and study when to add appropriate agression, your AF will rise and so will your profitability. If you just slam, slam, slam the pot, your AF will rise, but your variance will skyrocket as your bankroll plummets!